SECRETS OF LAW

Canceled mortgage (5)Understanding the Secrets of Law is paramount in arguing one’s case. The Law itself can oftentimes become a double-edged sword. The very weapon that one uses to triumph can also be used to one’s demise, if not used properly.

Understanding the secret of law is not just merely understanding what the law means, but, just as important, knowing how and when to use it. Timing and application is essential.

A law is a weapon of war, and the most skilled presenter is the victor who will take the spoils. The laws we present are the weapons you need to fight; however, how you and/or your attorney are able to wield them will determine the outcome of your battle or war. Everyone’s outcome is not always the same. That, in a nutshell, is the fundamental process of our legal system.

Again, we must reiterate: we are not attorneys or financial advisors. We are an organization that have performed extensive research on various laws, in order to legally prepare and process Negotiable Security Instruments that are used to discharge and cancel your debt.

U.S. Congress Convened to Create, Write, and Approve Banking Laws

Our legally processed Promissory Notes fall under the UNITED NATIONS Treaty that the United States Government accepted in 1989 and the laws of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION MUNICIPALITY located in WASHINGTON, D.C. (DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPALITY), with the PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION as its Chief Executive Officer, according to the Second Corporate Constitution Act of 1871 when the United States of America became a Corporate Municipality.

Here are a few Banking Laws that support and govern the Negotiable Security Instrument; Little Promissory Note; and International Promissory Note Security Instruments. These Instruments are processed by David Allen Young at DG Processing Enterprise, who is a legally licensed Security Documents Processor. These Instruments are issued by Private Bankers Bank, N.A. a common law national bank.

12 U.S. Code § 24 Seventh – BANK Corporate powers of associations (in daily course of banking business to negotiate Promissory Notes.)

U.C.C. Article 3 §501-505 and §601 (Presentment of Promissory Note Securities.)

31 U.S.C. §5312(2)(C) Becoming a Private banker at www.PBNBA.com in order to legally write by signing the NSI, LPN, or IPN Securities to issue to the banks to legally pay off your debts by a court ruling.

Title 18>Part 1>Chapter 1> section 1>Sec.8; by legal and statutory definition (U.C.C. 4-§105, 12 CFR §229.2, §210.2 and Title 12 U.S.C. §1813) as Legal Tender, “Lawful Money ” Title 12 U.S.C. §411; written and issued under Authority of the United States Code 31 U.S.C. §392 and §5103, which officially defines these notes (NSI, LPN, IPN Securities) as a statutory legal tender money obligation of THE UNITED STATES, and are written and issued in accordance with 31 U.S.C. §3123; U.C.C. Articles 3, 8, and 9; FEDERAL RESERVE ACT 16; and Federal Reserve Banking Laws that establish and provide for their issuance as “PUBLIC POLICY,” in remedy for discharge of equity interest recovery on that portion of and reducing the public debt by the Security face amount to its Principals and Sureties bearing the Obligation of THE UNITED STATES.

CASE LAWS

Case Laws

Here are a few Court Case Laws involving the Promissory Note Securities: Law Successes from the NSI eBook. Please keep in mind that court cases before 1938 are still valid and quoted in policy law court cases after 1938, when Public Common Law Became Public Policy of the UNITED STATES Corporation in Washington, D.C., District of Columbia Municipality STATE, which is NOT part of the 50 organic separate States of the Organic Union, but controls all 50 BLANKED sub-corporation STATES OF AMERICA.

Patton v. Diemer, 35 Ohio St. 3d 68; 518 N.E.2d 941 (1988). A judgment rendered by a court lacking subject matter jurisdiction is void ab initio. Consequently, the authority to vacate a void judgment is not derived from Ohio R. Civ. P. 60(B), but rather constitutes an inherent power possessed by Ohio courts. I see no evidence to the contrary that this would apply to ALL courts. “A party lacks standing to invoke the jurisdiction of a court unless he has, in an individual or a representative capacity, some real interest in the subject matter of the action.”

Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). “Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan…Therefore, the…matter is dismissed with prejudice.” – (This court case was unpublished and hidden from the public)

Stachnik v. Winkel, 394Mich. 375, 387; 230 N.W.2d 529, 534 (1975). “In determining whether the plaintiffs come before this Court with clean hands, the primary factor to be considered is whether the plaintiffs sought to mislead or deceive the other party, not whether that party relied upon plaintiffs’ misrepresentations.”

United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d, 526 (7th Cir. 1981). Cert Denied, 50 U.S. L.W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, (1982). “Indeed, no more than (affidavits) is necessary to make the prima facie case.”

U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297 (1977). “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.”

You can find more of these laws at www.Cancel1Mortgage.info. Also, CLICK HERE see what our Clients have to say!